Mar 12 2008
Does ExpoTV have credibility?
ExpoTV is a site that aggregates user-generated product review videos. Its’ a great concept that moves beyond the traditional text-based product reviews. Judging by by the funding they have recently received, investors believe it is very promising.
I recently encountered ExpoTV videos posted on YouTube that caused me to pause and sniff. Although these are genuine user-generated reviews, my impression is that they are somewhat disingenuous. So I investigated further and found ExpoTV has chosen to directly pay for reviews. Users can earn cash for every review that is accepted. ExpoTV states that “Our consumer reporters work from home and earn up to $10.00 for each approved review they submit. That’s enough to cover their time and effort but not enough to give you anything other than the straight scoop. The real deal. Your consumer guide.” This seems like a reasonable assertion but it’s my impression that users are putting up reviews to earn money. Though this is a very modest amount, I believe that it still amounts to a bribe and affects the nature of the reviews.
The presenters appear to be stay-at-home moms and good number of others from the now swelling ranks of the unemployed. Some presentations are “so bad that they’re good”; like the review for Kingsford Charcoal. But most are very milquetoast and uninspired with generous user ratings. Users know that they need to pass a screening process and it appears to affect the nature of the reviews. Take a look for yourself and let me know if it raises your BS meter.
The biggest hurdle for any business in the product reviews arena is to create a critical mass of content in order to establish credibility. This is many times accomplished through incentives such as contests and give-aways and seems to be accepted. But I question the strategy of directly paying for reviews. Time and time again the public has rejected content that does not serve them. This may be the undoing of ExpoTV.
